Last night we got the BCS Championship game. People are buzzing about what a great game we saw, with the game coming down to a last second chip shot field goal to win the game for Auburn, 22-19. Wow. What drama. This was amazing!
Bulls#$%. That game had an over of 74. They scored just over half of that. There were 3 INTs thrown in the first quarter. And they were not amazing INTs; they were horrible throws. The scoring picked up in the 2nd quarter, with 27 points in that quarter. That's more like it, right? Well, 3 points were scored in the 3rd, and 11 points in the 4th. Wow. What an offensive explosion!!!! Amazing playing!!!!
Do I blame the players or coaches? Possibly. Were the defenses amazing? Not really. I blame the lack of production by two of the highest scoring teams in the regular season to the 12th man. Rust! These two teams had 37 days off between their last game and this title game. 37 f#$%ing days. How good would you be at your job if you went to training classes for over a month. You were technically working and learning new things, but when you step back in your chair to start back up at your job, you would be rusty. You would be trying to find out what was going on while you were out. You would be getting a feel of any new systems put into place while you were gone. And you would be flustered when people started calling you asking for updates of things you were still trying to find out about on your own.
Try doing all of that with 275 pound beasts running after you trying to beat you into submission.
37 days is a joke. I understand wanting to have your biggest game on its own night. But the last BCS game before this title game was played 7 days earlier. You are not the Super Bowl. You do not need that much lead in for this game. Especially since the match-up was announced over 5 weeks earlier. Do your press earlier. What - ESPN is not going to cover your presser just because another BCS game is happening later that day? Whatever. The game should have been played the day after the Sugar Bowl. That cuts out a week.
And who says the BCS games have to start on New Years Day? They have already f#$%ed with the tradition of these games so much with the BCS system, why not move up the games some? Why can't the national title game be on New Years Day, and the other BCS games the days leading up to it? Having the National Title game on New Years day cuts out 10 days of waiting, making the wait 27 days. I still think that is too long, but I think that is as good as you can get for this situation.
If you must keep the system where the National Title game is a week after the last BCS game, then it should be moved to a 4+1 model (or 5+1 model). This situation would also fix the situation we have with TCU having an undefeated season and not having a shot to play for the title. Under the 4+1 system, you eliminate two deadweight BCS teams invited to play, and you play the 4 BCS games. Then at the end of those games, the Top 2 BCS teams would play for the title. Also, this model would require that certain limitations be placed on what teams can play in the BCS games, such as conference champions with horrible records and/or BCS rankings would lose their automatic qualification unless their record and/or ranking was at a certain level. This would also allow original traditions for the bowls could be restored (i.e. this year, Oregon would have played Wisconsin in the Rose Bowl). In this situation, you still get all of the games, and the rust that may have been built up over the 27 day delay can be worked out in those games, and then in the Title Game a week later the two teams can be playing at an optimal level.
But as you already know, this would never happen. Why? Because the BCS school presidents are making a s#$%load of money using this system. And when it comes time to renew the BCS contract, they will tweak it in any way that makes them the most money. And the masses who watch college football will continue to watch it, and the schools will continue to get rich off of it. And until the consumers actually revolt against the system, the system will continue to move forward as is. Too many people are too wrapped up into their teams to ever boycott watching them in an effort to make the experience better down the road.
I am not so much in favor for a tournament. I am neither for it or against it. I just know that the chances of it happening are so remote that I am not even wasting brain power to even think about it. And I am not one of these people that think that non-BCS teams deserve anything under this system. The NCAA sold their soul for the BCS system, and therefore it is almost like the non-BCS teams are just the annoying guy at the door of a party trying to get in, and being told by the bouncer to go to the back of the line. You are not invited - stop crying. Boise State had a chance to go to a BCS conference to prove their worth, and they decided to take an easier road in another non-BCS conference. TCU went the other way, and they went to a BCS conference. I absolutely respect what TCU did (albeit, going to the Big East was not an amazingly strong move), and I hope it benefits them down the road. But non-BCS teams, stop b@#$%ing about not having a legit chance at a BCS title. Non-BCS says it all - you don't get a chance until you become part of a BCS conference. Work on getting your conference part of the BCS, or go to one. And shut your mouth.
All that being said, I can't wait for next fall!